More gun control won't fix it

I'm a middle class white woman of retirement age.

I'm a law-abiding citizen.

I have no criminal record.

I was the victim of a violent crime involving a handgun in my youth.

I do not support new firearm control measures.

I do not monetarily or politically support the National Rifle Association.

I plan to purchase my first handgun and a permit to carry within the next two weeks, before the right to do so is stripped from me by someone I didn't vote for and who does not represent ME in the state legislature. Call it a form of protest. 

The men in my family have always owned firearms so I grew up around guns. Firearms are not toys and I never misunderstood that they were. The toy pistols my little cowgirl self played with were the only "guns" I played with because never, ever, never did any of the adults in my life leave a gun where I could pick it up and play with it.

When I was about eleven or twelve, I was allowed to accompany the men to target and trap shoot. They taught me my first lesson - NEVER let the barrel of the gun point at anyone. Second lesson - how to make sure the safety was on. As you may imagine, those lessons were taught simultaneously. It was only after I demonstrated I could find the safety on the various firearms they had was I allowed to handle an unloaded handgun. And it was a few target shooting trips later until I was allow to actually point a rifle at anything, and later still until I got one with a cartridge in the chamber.

At the very core of our past, current and future weapons control debate lies the fact no one wants to be responsible for their own actions anymore. No one wants to take the time to teach their children how to be responsible and no one wants to be held accountable when their children do bad things through lack of parental instruction.

The government is not a substitute parent.

The Second Amendment as ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State, is worded as follows: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

I concede the point I'm not part of a militia, but should the need, God forbid, ever arise, I could be. I see in the first half of the Second Amendment a clear call that as an American I should stand ready to defend my home and my freedom at all times because my country has acknowledged the action may be necessary.

And because this action may become necessary no one shall have the right to deny me "arms." Which we all know in the language of those times means firearms.

But back to why I can't support new gun control laws.

Laws are made by and for lawful people. It is the lawful that uphold the law. When I purchase a handgun I expect to fill out multiple forms and jump through multiple hoops. It's annoying, but I'll do it because it's the law. And because I abide by the law, I'll be able to purchase a handgun. 

(Maybe I'll get a surprise and they won't give me a permit, at which time I'll know in my gut America is truly dying and dystopia is closer to reality than I feared possible.)

The checks and balances we have in place are enough to ensure law abiding citizens continue to have the right to bear arms. They are cumbersome and bureaucratic and waste time and money and I think it's been proven they don't stop criminals or someone bent on killing from doing whatever they damn well please whenever they want to do it. More laws will simply impact and infringe on the law-abiding citizen.

Enough, already. Let's live in the real world, stop the political posturing, and fix what really needs fixed - people.

People. The beginning and the end of everything.

People.

Whiskey Sour by J.A. Konrath

One of the things I wanted to do in my retirement was read more. I've been a little slow getting to that because I've been a little slow getting my retirement. By that I mean I tried to retire but my employer kept calling me, begging me, to please come in for the morning or please come in for the afternoon, or please come in well so-and-so was on vacation. You get the picture. Now I'm finally at a point where I seem to have more days at home than I do filling in. Now I that I finally have time to set aside an afternoon or two a week for reading, I’m loving life. And since I promised myself that I would review some of the books I've read, I’ve found the place to start 2013 - Whiskey Sour by JA Konrath.

Whiskey Sour is book one in a series followed by Bloody Mary, Rusty Nail, Dirty Martini, Fuzzy Navel, and Cherry Bomb.  The author has quite a few more books but for right now I'm just want to read the six book series. His author page at the Big A says the books don’t need to be read in order, but I like order. Order is good. I’ll read them in order.

Our lead is homicide detective Jacqueline “Jack” Daniels. She's mid-forties, very average, and believes what she does might just one day make a difference for someone. The character is written as a woman who has embraced her maturity and realizes life isn't a rose garden. She wins some, she loses some, but she keeps right on going and that's one of the things I liked about her. She felt real in a lot of aspects except for how well she threw a punch.

The cast of characters was a bit cliché, but I didn't feel like Konrath pandered to an audience accustomed to bumbling FBI agents and other bureaucrats. Some of the scenes and dialogue were flat-out funny to the point I actually laughed. Konrath is a bit irreverent but I like that.

I didn't want to give away any plot spoilers, but I will say there is a little bit of, well, gore.  It's downright bloody, but I didn't want to put it down but some people get really hung up on that so I thought I'd mention it. Personally, if it fits the story line, much like homicide detective Jack Daniels, I can deal with it. But be warned that the perpetrator is more than a little insane and acts accordingly as he hunts young women. He didn't get nearly the ending he deserved being that it was too quick and he didn't suffer nearly enough. And I know Konrath has the ability to write a really detailed scene so I can only guess he saw those two words writers love - The End - approaching and he got in a hurry.

I wouldn’t call this book a short story but I did devour it in a long afternoon. I couldn't put it down. Between that and the fact that I've already purchased Bloody Mary (book two) and have cleared my calendar for an afternoon to read it is probably the best recommendation I can give Whiskey Sour.

Good book and well worth your time.

I'd have put a picture of the book up here but I don't know Mr. Konrath and didn't know how he'd feel about some amateur swiping his stuff for on her blog.

After the election

With yesterday's election over, I'm left with only four things to be grateful for.

1. Thank God I have access to fresh spring water.

2. Thank God I have a woodstove.

3. Thank God I have enough land upon which to grow a garden.

4. Thank God I have a gun and deer, squirrel, wild turkey and rabbit for meat.

I may buy a pair of goats and some chickens while money is still worth something, too.

Speak its name

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/05/13/Newsweek-Obama-first-gay-prez

This article speaks volumes.

This says it all

This sums up for me the biggest problem in the United States today - PEOPLE and the GIMME attitude.

In fifty years of being in the workforce, I collected one, count 'em - one - week of unemployment benefits. No medical bennies. No free eyeglasses. No free dental work. No grants. No scholarships. No welfare.

I have a mortgage free house. I have a 100% paid for car in top running condition. I have a retirement fund. I have an investment fund. I pay cash for everything.

How did I manage to accomplish these things?  I WORKED a JOB, and not the system.

Don't pat me on the back. I didn't do one damn thing special. I did what every citizen of the United States should do.

I took care of myself. I didn't expect someone else or the government to do it for me.

And I'm a better person for it.

American obituary?

I've read this before in a publication sent out to ministers, and it contains a scary grain of truth. I see this happening around me, and pray I don't live to experience the end of it. - TW

* * *

In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior:

"A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government.

A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.

From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through  the following sequence:

From bondage to spiritual faith;

  

From spiritual faith to great courage;

  

From courage to liberty;

From liberty to abundance;

  

From abundance to complacency;

  

From complacency to apathy;

From apathy to dependence;

  

From dependence back into bondage."

Personal choices

Those 'pass it on' emails. They keep you informed on what.... on what? I'm not sure. I got one in my email this morning from a close friend. She's a Democrat, but I try not to hold that against her. We rarely discuss politics because the urge to slap.... um....it's better to stay friends with them than point out how stupid they can be.

There's an old joke that's not very funny when you think about it. I'm using the "he" pronoun for readability. Get over it, girls.

A Democrat sees something on television he doesn't like. He calls on the government to pass a law to ban it because, in his opinion, the American people shouldn't see it, hear it, know it, and it's up to the government to tell the people what's best for them.

A Republican sees something on television he doesn't like. He changes the channel.

The point, in case you didn't get it, is about personal choice. 

Roe vs. Wade turns 39 today.

It doesn't matter what you think is right or wrong in someone else's life, only your own.

Try to use your head and think about that for yourself. Don't base your opinions on religious or political rhetoric. Reach down into your gut and imagine the loss of personal choice in the kind of coffee you drink or the kind of car you drive. Imagine your neighbor having the right to dictate to you the color of the flowers you can plant in your garden.

Think.